<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: foolhandy&#8217;s albums of the noughties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolhandy.com/2009/12/22/foolhandys-albums-of-the-noughties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolhandy.com/2009/12/22/foolhandys-albums-of-the-noughties/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolhandy</title>
		<link>http://foolhandy.com/2009/12/22/foolhandys-albums-of-the-noughties/comment-page-1/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>foolhandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolhandy.com/?p=1731#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Chris.

I&#039;ve never really known why it wasn&#039;t more popular, but then I came to Pulp with This Is Hardcore having really disliked their earlier stuff (bar Sorted for Es &amp; Whizz). Both albums have a very different vibe to early-Pulp, or mid-Pulp where I imagine they picked up most of their fan base, so maybe it just wasn&#039;t what people were looking (or hoping) for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Chris.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never really known why it wasn&#8217;t more popular, but then I came to Pulp with This Is Hardcore having really disliked their earlier stuff (bar Sorted for Es &#038; Whizz). Both albums have a very different vibe to early-Pulp, or mid-Pulp where I imagine they picked up most of their fan base, so maybe it just wasn&#8217;t what people were looking (or hoping) for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M.</title>
		<link>http://foolhandy.com/2009/12/22/foolhandys-albums-of-the-noughties/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolhandy.com/?p=1731#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why there is/ was  a perception among Pulp fans that We Love Life is a sucky album. It was the first album of Pulp I&#039;ve listened to and I love the fab contributions of Richard Hawley in it. Granting that it was their weakest in terms of concept and vocals , it had, however, the best arrangements among the three mainstream albums of Pulp (Roadkill, Trees and Sunrise in particular).   I&#039;ve been reading past reviews of this one just lately, and I can&#039;t believe how much this was hated then. Who cares if it was snubbed in the deluxe treatment, it&#039;s perfect already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why there is/ was  a perception among Pulp fans that We Love Life is a sucky album. It was the first album of Pulp I&#8217;ve listened to and I love the fab contributions of Richard Hawley in it. Granting that it was their weakest in terms of concept and vocals , it had, however, the best arrangements among the three mainstream albums of Pulp (Roadkill, Trees and Sunrise in particular).   I&#8217;ve been reading past reviews of this one just lately, and I can&#8217;t believe how much this was hated then. Who cares if it was snubbed in the deluxe treatment, it&#8217;s perfect already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention foolhandy’s albums of the noughties -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://foolhandy.com/2009/12/22/foolhandys-albums-of-the-noughties/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention foolhandy’s albums of the noughties -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolhandy.com/?p=1731#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by foolhandy, James Channing. James Channing said: foolhandy&#039;s albums of the noughties: Scott Walker&#039;s production is great and Jarvis Cocker&#039;s lyrics seem to be more ... http://bit.ly/7jAYwa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by foolhandy, James Channing. James Channing said: foolhandy&#39;s albums of the noughties: Scott Walker&#39;s production is great and Jarvis Cocker&#39;s lyrics seem to be more &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/7jAYwa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7jAYwa</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolhandy</title>
		<link>http://foolhandy.com/2009/12/22/foolhandys-albums-of-the-noughties/comment-page-1/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>foolhandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolhandy.com/?p=1731#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>I like the fact that neither or our lists have much in common with what you&#039;ll find elsewhere but for very different reasons! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fact that neither or our lists have much in common with what you&#8217;ll find elsewhere but for very different reasons! <img src='http://foolhandy.com/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie</title>
		<link>http://foolhandy.com/2009/12/22/foolhandys-albums-of-the-noughties/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolhandy.com/?p=1731#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>Not too bad, till you get to the top 3 ;o) I love the Pulp album as well, it just wasn&#039;t strong enough to fit into my list but what floating about just outside it. Sxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too bad, till you get to the top 3 ;o) I love the Pulp album as well, it just wasn&#8217;t strong enough to fit into my list but what floating about just outside it. Sxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
